Affiliate disclosure
This site uses affiliate links. If a reader opens an account with Onlyspins after following one, the portal may receive a commission. It costs the reader nothing and changes none of the offer conditions: the same bonus, the same multiplier, the same deadline apply either way.
What it changes and what it does not
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Does it influence the calculations? | No. Multipliers and contribution weights come from the operator's terms and are not editable. |
| Are negatives suppressed? | No. The editorial log publishes unfavourable measurements as readily as favourable ones. |
| Does the reader pay more? | No. Commission is paid by the affiliate programme, not by the player. |
| Is the bonus different through these links? | No. Promotional terms are identical for everyone. |
| Is the site owned by the operator? | No. It is independent, with no ownership link. |
Why say it out loud
Because knowing how a publication earns its money is part of judging what it writes. A site funded by commissions has an interest in registrations happening; hiding that would be the actual deception. The defence is not denial but verifiability — every number here is published with the formula behind it, so any claim can be re-checked after the fact.
Practical consequences
- Affiliate links open in a separate window and lead to the operator's own platform.
- All promotional figures come from public terms, which the operator may change at any time.
- No invented testimonials and no unverifiable licence numbers appear on this site.
- Nothing here is legal advice; complying with local rules is the reader's responsibility.
- The content is for adults only.
How to check that commission is not bending anything
The answer is a method rather than a promise. Every published figure comes with its formula: turnover is bonus multiplied by the requirement, daily pace is turnover divided by the deadline, expected cost is turnover multiplied by the house edge. Anyone can recompute all three from the operator's public terms. If a derivation fails to reproduce, that is a verifiable error rather than a difference of opinion — and verifiability is the strongest protection against bias that a commercially funded site can offer.
The second safeguard is publishing the negatives. The editorial log carries measurements that a purely sales-driven page would never print: that the 21-day window is unreachable for a weekend player, that the stake ceiling is enforced retrospectively, and that a withdrawal request cancels a running bonus. Those entries work against commission and stay in anyway, because the value of the portal rests entirely on whether its numbers hold up.
Related documents: about us, author, terms, privacy, self-exclusion and limits.